To follow the logic of Trump’s lawyer’s wouldn’t one have to show how the hiring of Nathan Wade is somehow damaging to Trump receiving a fair trial?
Let’s recap the key facts:
Yes it looks tawdry to hire Nathan Wade as lead prosecutor on the Georgia RICO Trial, then have an affair with him and go on trips together with Wade paying back Ms. Willis of his end of the costs in cash.
Yet, was Wade awarded this contract a competitive bidding process? No.
Was there ever any proof that he “kicked back” money to become the lead Prosecutor for the Georgia RICO case citing Trump and several of his minions? No.
In terms of Trump fixing or tampering with the prosecution, the only logical course would be to threaten or bribe Wade. Essentially having Wade take a dive or perform a weak prosecution. Well, that seems that holds no plausibility.
Are the “vacation trips” a form of kick back to Ms. Willis? Should we believe “African Americans do large scale transactions in cash?” Well, how would I and should I know this is a cultural thing? These two are both attorneys after all who understand the implications of “cash” payments and the legalities surrounding them.
Trump is mentally retarded, he can't keep his mouth shut, so he has to pay millions. Do we want him for president hell no!!!!